The PAPpy ministers are good at playing word gymnastics. They keep saying that we have one of the lowest taxes in the world. What a load of bull crap. What we have is one of the lowest INCOME tax structure in the world. But our TOTAL tax is very high. Taxes include COE, GST, Road Tax, simisai tax, blah, blah, blah…
However, what caught my eye is a report that Tharman said that in order to have first-world safety net, we must have first world taxes.
‘First-world social safety net’ means first-world taxes too: Tharman
Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam noted in Parliament on Thursday that some MPs had called for higher healthcare expenditure, but said that this would require higher taxes.
As it is, the Government is already increasing its healthcare expenditure from the current 1.5 per cent of Singapore’s gross domestic product to 3.5 per cent by 2030, he said. If Singapore’s spending on healthcare go up to 6 per cent of the GDP – which is what Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries spend – then it has to raise taxes too, he said.
Mr Tharman said he did not like the term ‘first world social safety net’ used by opposition MP Low Thia Khiang to describe the Budget earlier in the debate.
If Singapore had a first world social safety net, then this may mean first world taxes, said Mr Tharman.
So he says that we must have first world taxes to have first world safety net. Here’s a piece of data that shows how first world countries spend on healthcare, in terms of % GDP.
Total expenditure as % of GDP (most recent) by country
Partial screenshot
Tharman claims that for the next twenty years, we will increase our expenditure on healthcare to 3.5% of GDP. Tharman also mentioned that 6.1% of GDP (as suggested by WP) would cause us to have “first world taxes”.
That’s where the crap is. Let’s look at where we can really cut down on wastage in the first place. Our defence budget. We are among the highest spenders on defence in terms of % GDP in the world. Barring the Arab nations, who can splurge all the money they want, the only two first world countries that have a higher % GDP on defence than us are the two most warmongering nations in the world – US and Israel.
World Wide Military Expenditures – 2011
United States – 5.2% (mad country, creating wars)
Israel – 7.3% (mad country, killing civilian population)
Singapore – 4.9% (mad country?? Paranoid. No enemy also spend like hell)
Compare the above to other first world countries. The average is 1% to 2+% only. And Switzerland, the country that has NS like us and no wars for centuries? Yep, 1% only.
Can’t we reduce our mad defence budget and use that for the more needy healthcare area? Why not? I am not saying that we should not spend on defence. I am saying that we should cut down unnecessary spending on our defence.
Most of the spending is due to PAP’s and SAF’s paranoia for the Biiiig Baaaad Bogey Man from the North and South of us. After all, didn’t Chan Chun Sing, former army chief, try to scare us that there are 200+ million Indonesians out to usurp tiny Singapore, when they are more concerned about feeding their families, farming and fishing to earn a living, than to be concerned about Sinkiepore?
Not that Singapore has much to offer to these 200+ million Indonesians that it would make it worthwhile for them to invade us in the first place. If Sinkiepore, according to PAP, has to have taxes like first world to give 5 million first world safety net, that would mean Sinkiepore won’t be able to sustain 200+ million invaders, would it? So it would now come to one of these things:
1. Chan Chun Sing bluffed us that Sinkie is worth to be invaded by 200+ million hostile people.
2. Tharman bluffed us that we can’t support giving 5 million population first world healthcare, because Singapore can support 200+ million to make it worth their while to usurp us.
You see, PAPpies talk cock so much, they don’t even know they contradict each other.
My Conclusion
Tharman, by saying that we need to have first world taxes to have first world safety net, is not looking deep into where we can cut our spending. But then again, PAPpy, being paranoid about the Biiiig Baaad Bogeyman that lurks in the North and South of us, will of course be blind to the fact that we are wasting billions to feed their paranoia.
In the meantime, Sinkies will have to suffer because stingy paranoid PAP doesn’t want to spend on our healthcare more.










