>In the world today, we see feminists debunking the age old family values, calling it partriarchial. We see threats to the traditional family from all directions. From radical feminists to the gay pride.
Traditional family values require parents to be in charge of their children. It is not the duty of dare care centres, domestic help or schools. If parents do not get involved in their children’s activities, the wolves will come after their sheep.
From the Straits Times
Too sexy for kids?
THE games look like they are designed for children, with colourful animated characters and cheery music. But the aim of one such game, called Under Cover, is for the player – who might well be a child – to snap photographs of women’s exposed underwear.
Players of another game called Lust for Bust are supposed to stare at women’s breasts for as long as possible without being caught.
These free online flash games – electronic games played on Web browsers – are practically training players to be perverts.
And they are reaching a wide audience through multiple gaming websites on the Internet.
For example, statistics on just one website show that Under Cover has been played more than 6.5 million times since it was launched in February last year.
Experts here are warning against the potential risks, particularly for children, of such free online flash games, some of which contain sexual content.
Exposure to such materials may result in children being desensitised to sex, and eventually trivialising it, said Mr Poh Yeang Cherng, 41, manager of Touch Cyber Wellness & Sports, a cyber-wellness education programme for youth run by voluntary welfare group Touch Community Services.
‘Children are in their formative years and their values can be influenced playing these games,” he added.
A school counsellor, who declined to be named, said that when it comes to undesirable content in games, violence, and not sex, is the first concern that comes to mind.
Children who play these games may form degrading views of the opposite gender from young and this could affect their relationships with others in future, he warned. — MYPAPER
From the same webpage above, here is another link giving the background story.
HOOKED ON UPSKIRT PHOTOGRAPHY
A NINE-YEAR-OLD girl started playing games like Under Cover, where the player snaps upskirt photographs of women, after her friend sent her a link to the website which hosted them.
Such free online games that mask sexual content have been an ‘in thing” among her friends for about three months, because they found playing such games exciting, the girl said.
She said she knows that the behaviour portrayed in the games is unacceptable. She would not behave that way, or want to be on the receiving end of such actions, in reality.
But she felt that playing the games was harmless as their characters are ‘fake, like cartoons, and do not have feelings’.
Her alarmed accountant mother, 38, said: ‘It’s shocking, I didn’t know my child could play such games online.”
The average parent is unaware of such potential risks in free online games, said Mr Poh Yeang Cherng, 41, manager of Touch Cyber Wellness & Sports, a cyber-wellness education programme for youth run by Touch Community Services.
The programme does not track the number of children playing such games online. But its informal poll showed that up to 40 per cent of lower- secondary school students have played Grand Theft Auto 4, even though it is a violent video game with sexual content that has been rated ‘mature-18′.
Such games are harder for children to access than free online games, as they can be bought only by those aged above 18.
Ms Yuvarani Thangavelu, the Media Development Authority’s (MDA) deputy director for licensing policy, said that it has taken initiatives to safeguard the young from harmful online content, but these have limitations, given the Internet’s borderless nature.
Parents can subscribe to a service that filters out undesirable materials, which is provided by Internet service providers SingTel, StarHub and PacNet, with help from the MDA.] But such content in games cannot be detected easily by the filters as it is embedded, a StarHub spokesman said. Parents can also adjust settings on the Internet browsers or install client-based filtering software to block specific websites.
But probably the best precaution they can take is to be more aware of their children’s online activities and to communicate openly, said the National Institute of Education’s Associate Professor Angeline Khoo, who developed Internet safety materials for parents.
It is a known fact that today, many parents spend much less time with their children, as compared to our forefathers. This kind of environment suits those who have intention to influence young children with odious ideas.
Young minds are the most vulnerable. Here is where they can be shaped. It is a small wonder that those with not so good intentions target this group of youngsters. They include:
1. Porn site distributors -
This group as seen from the article, introduce them as children’s games. It may seem innocent at first, but they are starting somewhere. It is not a secret that the two most profitable online industries are the gaming and the porn industries. The money involved is too lucrative for these people not to target young children – a big pool of future customers when they grow up as adults.
2. The gay pride -
As we now know, the gay pride also start their work on children when they are young. The introduction of the CSE through Aware was made public earlier this year. I have shown in my past articles links that Aware has had foreign help to introduce gay materials into schools.
Quoting Poh Yeang Cherng, 41, manager of Touch Cyber Wellness & Sports in the first article above, he said:
“Children who play these games may form degrading views of the opposite gender from young and this could affect their relationships with others in future, he warned”.
I fully agree. Gays know that too. That’s why they start them young.
In another article, unrelated to the one above, we have another sad story of the effects of debunking traditional values for so called “modern values”.
It is believed that promiscuous sex is one contributor to cervical cancer in women. Instead of teaching girls abstinence, a national campaign was set to vaccinate young girls against cervical cancer, because presumably educating about abstinence doesn’t work.
Here are the after effects of the vaccination.
Two thousand schoolgirls suffer suspected ill-effects from cervical cancer vaccine
Source: Telegraph
Thousands of schoolgirls have suffered suspected adverse reactions to a controversial cervical cancer vaccine introduced by the Government.
Doctors’ reports show that girls of 12 and 13 have experienced convulsions, fever and paralysis after being given the vaccine, which is now administered in schools as part of efforts to prevent women developing cancer.
Others suffered nausea, muscle weakness, dizziness and blurred vision, according to a special report drawn up by drug safety watchdogs.
A support group says it has received dozens of calls from parents who believe their daughters have been damaged by the vaccine.
The parents of one teenage girl given the jab last autumn believe it was to blame for repeated seizures which have left her with brain damage and psychosis.
The immunisation programme for teenage girls is controversial because it protects them from the sexually transmitted human papillomavirus which causes 70 per cent of cervical tumours.
When the Government introduced the Cervarix vaccination programme last year, some campaigners dubbed it a “promiscuity jab”.
Campaigners and families said the new figures showed the vaccination should not have been introduced via a mass programme.
More than one million girls have already been given the jab, which is offered to all as they enter their teens.
Until 2011 it will also be administered to older girls, so that all female teens below the age of 18 will be covered by the programme.
Ministers say that ultimately the scheme will save 700 lives a year, while drug safety experts insist the number of suspected reactions are outweighed by the benefits from the jab.
Most of the more than 2,000 suspected reactions recorded by drug safety watchdog Medicines and Health care products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) were mild, with dozens of girls recording rashes, pain in the arm, and allergies.
But the report prepared by the MHRA earlier this month also discloses cases in which teens have suffered convulsions, eye rolling, muscle spasms, seizures and hyperventilation soon after being given the jab.
The analysis by the MHRA, drawn up this month, found 2,107 patients had reported some kind of suspected adverse reaction to Cervarix. Several reported multiple reactions, with 4,602 suspected side-effects recorded in total.
Jackie Fletcher, founder of Jabs, a support group for families whose children have fallen ill after immunisation, said she had taken dozens of calls from parents who believed their daughters had been damaged by the cervical cancer vaccine.
She said: “We have spoken to parents whose daughters have had seizures, paralysis, blurred vision, severe headaches and the loss of feeling in parts of their body.
“Doctors will try to convince parents that these problems are in their child’s mind, or have nothing to do with the vaccines, but we don’t think there is sufficient evidence to show Cervarix is safe.”
Medical safety experts insist the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks.
They say many of the patients who experienced an “adverse” reaction to the jab since April 2008, including some who took part in drug trials or bought the drug privately, only suffered short-term side effects from the injection process, not as a result of the drug.
There was no evidence to suggest “isolated cases of other medical conditions” were actually caused by the vaccine, and not just a coincidence, the regulator’s report said.
Cancer charities urged parents to continue allowing their daughters to have the jabs, saying the numbers were well within what would have been expected for a large-scale programme, and that most of the side effects were minor.
Robert Music, director of cervical cancer charity Jo’s Trust said: “I can understand why parents would feel cautious, but this programme could reduce 70 per cent of cervical cancers.
We need to keep reviewing the evidence, but we would really urge parents to make sure their daughters have the vaccination.”
Stacey Jones is one of those who believes she has suffered side effects from the vaccine. She was 17 when she had her first Cervarix injection.
Her parents Julie and Kerry, from Bilston, West Midlands, noticed her becoming increasingly emotional in the weeks following the first two jabs, but feared their “happy-go-lucky” girl had finally succumbed to adolescent moodswings.
Within four days of the third injection in March of this year, Stacey suffered an epileptic seizure, followed by 17 more in the following week.
She has now been diagnosed with a brain injury, caused by inflammation of the brain, and is being treated in an NHS rehabilitation unit in Birmingham, which helps her with basic tasks like making a sandwich.
Seizures are minimised by five types of medication, but her memory is badly damaged.
The family has been given no explanation for how the damage occurred. Mrs Jones, 44, said: “She was such a lovely, happy go-lucky girl, now she is just a shell.
“When we go to see her, she can’t remember what she has just eaten for tea. The impact on her and all of us has been absolutely devastating. I feel she has been used as a guinea pig.”
A spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline, which makes Cervarix, said the drug had to undergo rigorous testing, with over 70,000 doses used in trials before a licence was granted.
He said: “The UK medicines safety agency has reviewed all reported adverse events relevant to Cervarix and there is no evidence to suggest that the vaccine carries any long-term side effects.
“The symptoms this girl has experienced are clearly upsetting and it is understandable that the girl and her parents want to uncover the cause.”
Let’s face the hard facts. The only guaranteed methods against these sex related diseases are abstinence and loyalty to spouse.
All other “safe sex” methods are no guarantee.
So why is this very effective option abstinence and/or loyalty to spouse are always under-emphasized in sex education programmes?
Nothing, but NOTHING, beats good old traditional family values.