American atrocities – Little girl shot in head and lives to tell her story

The United States of Terrormerica, the Number One Terror Nation, continues to commit crimes in the name of Democrazy.

WAR WITH IRAN: MORE CHILDREN WILL SUFFER

A little girl was shot in the head by the Americans.

0:15 min -
Interviewer: Why do you need surgery?

Little girl: Because in my head, I got shoot.

Interviewer: And who shot you?

Little girl: America people.

0:30 min – bullet entered girl’s left temple, exited through her forehead. When the bullet exited, it exploded and shattered her skull.

0:50 min -
Interviewer: If you could talk to the soldier who shot you, what would you say?

Little girl: Why did you shoot me? It’s not fair. I did not do anything. Why you shoot me? I’m a girl.

Note the little girl’s pain and innocent smile as she wonders why she was shot.

1:30 min – More victims are introduced in the video.

The little girl’s op was sponsored by “No More Victims”, an American NGO that opposes the wars.

Stop the madness. Stop the wars.

Visit NoMoreVictims.org for more information.

US/Nato Atroticities – killing innocents, children included

The United States of Terrormerica, in collusion with its allies, terrorizes innocent civilians, bombing civilian infrastructure. This is the untold story of US and Nato’s bombing of Libya.

I Cried Watching This. Americans and Nato Bombing Babies , Every Human Must Watch. Spread It

3:24 min – Actual footage of bombs raining on civilians. Children included. You can hear the children screaming.

6:25 min – Child victim treated in hospital. Listen to his cries of pain from his injuries. The video continues to show more child victims.

9:50 min – Babies included.

Imagine a foreign force says your govt is oppressive and undemocratic.

Imagine that it decides to bomb your country in order to remove your govt.

Imagine that they bomb your schools, hospitals, homes and other civilian buildings.

Imagine that they kill many civilians in the process.

Imagine that those killed are your parents and children.

What would your reaction be?

Stop the wars. Stop the terror. Stop the hypocrisy.

American atrocieties – Fallujah under siege

The Lying Machine of the Mainstream Media, in collusion with the United States of Terrormerica, portrays Fallujuah which is a city in Iraq as a hotbed for breeding terrorists. Nothing is further than the truth.

In 2004, residents of Fallujah had one of their schools under siege by the American Terror Force. That’s when the civilian residents tried to claim their rightful school back. Then when some American vehicles were hit by IED, four Blackwater mercenaries who were killed had their bodies butchered and hung up in public by some angry residents.

The American media played up the horror scene and that agitated the American troops to kill more Iraqi civilians. The media told only half the story. The other half which is all about American crimes have been hidden.

But this video below is about to change that. Here’s the testimony from a first hand witness to the crimes the mainstream mass media hides. The video is uploaded by a blogger who makes numerous posts about war in Iraq. This video is about the incident in Fallujah, and the consequences that followed the school under siege. The poster of the video (the man at the bottom left of the screen) interviews a first hand witness to the war crimes that America tries to hide from the world. The war crimes committed in Fallujah in 2004.

Syrian Girl – Fallujah War Crimes

0:30 min – At the very beginning, the Fallujah Resistance didn’t start until American Forces took over a school. Residents protested and as result, 14 civilians died, including children and one US soldier. This was the first siege. (Violence started to spread from this incident and a total of about 800 civilians were killed eventually.)

6:05 min – Second Siege. There were more civilians killed, including babies. Sustained bombing. Hospitals, power stations hit.

7:00 – Males between 15 and 55 were not allowed to leave Fallujah when the others were evacuated.

7:45 – US Forces obliterated Fallujah. White Phosphorous used. (Warning – Video images are graphic @ 8:00)

8:35 – Even Enriched Uranium used.

9:30 – Neutron Bomb used on Baghdad Airport.

12:00 – Ambulances shot at.

13:10 – Second siege included bombing and raiding a hospital.

13:45 – American Forces handcuffed doctors and even pulled wounded patients from the operating tables. Destroyed medicine.

Heavy Civilian Casualties -

It has been reported that about 800 civilians were killed in each of the two sieges. The first siege was in Apr 2004 and the second in Nov 2004.

Remember Fallujah

War crimes in Fallujah

April 2004
According to a detailed analysis of 300 contemporary news reports by Iraq Body Count (www.iraqbodycount.org) at least 572 of the roughly 800 reported deaths during the first US siege of Fallujah in April 2004 were civilians, with over 300 of these being women and children.

…[snip]…

November 2004
A high-ranking Red Cross official estimated that “at least 800 civilians” were killed in the first 9 days of the November 2004 assault on Fallujah (Inter Press Service, 16 November 2004) – an operation originally codenamed “Thanksgiving massacre” (Telegraph, 24 December 2004).

America uses WMDs and has committed war crimes -

In the Siege of Fallujah, WMDs were used. That includes Enriched Uranium, White Phosphorous and perhaps the Neutron Bomb.

Some warmongers may argue that White Phosphorous is not classified as WMD, unlike Napalm or Agent Orange. My reply is – Really? Wanna try to have some White Phosphorous on your skin?

As if that is not enough, they bombed schools, hospitals, power stations and other civilian infrastructure. Not to mention they torture civilians, as well as kill women, children, the sick, invalid and the elderly.

Conclusion -

The wars must stop. These wars, be it is Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, the impending wars in Syria and Iran, are all for the purpose of usurping Muslim lands for their oil and rich mineral resource.

It isn’t about war against terror. It isn’t about democracy. It is about greed for other people’s lands and resource.

Stop the wars. Stop the madness. Stop the crimes.

American war crimes and SAF is complicit

The Mainstream Media glorifies wars. American veterans, who are actually terrorists who kill and maim innocents (women and children included), are honoured with medals. And of course, our SAF troops who have given them support are complicit. For those who think that SAF is giving humanitarian support, imagine giving such support to the Nazis.

Here are some of the results of the crimes committed by the Terrormericans.

Fallujah babies: Under a new kind of siege

Congenital abnormalities have mushroomed in the wake of devastating US sieges in Fallujah in 2004

The above defect is suspected to be caused by Enriched Uraniuam used by the Terrormerican Forces. Say… wasn’t Iraq invaded for the use of WMDs in the first place?

Enriched Uraniuam is not to be mistaken for Depleted Uranium (DU). The latter is found in the munitions of American equipment. DU is not used as a “weapon” but is used in the design of the equipment itself. However, DU does give off radiation that affects the population too, after the munitions have been expended.

Enriched Uranium on the other hand is used as part of WMD! So howabout invading The United States of Terrormerica?

US invasion leaves lasting Iraq scars

Excerpts from first link above:

Fallujah, Iraq – While the US military has formally withdrawn from Iraq, doctors and residents of Fallujah are blaming weapons like depleted uranium and white phosphorous used during two devastating US attacks on Fallujah in 2004 for what are being described as “catastrophic” levels of birth defects and abnormalities.

Dr Samira Alani, a paediatric specialist at Fallujah General Hospital, has taken a personal interest in investigating an explosion of congenital abnormalities that have mushroomed in the wake of the US sieges since 2005.

“We have all kinds of defects now, ranging from congenital heart disease to severe physical abnormalities, both in numbers you cannot imagine,” Alani told Al Jazeera at her office in the hospital, while showing countless photos of shocking birth defects.

As of December 21, Alani, who has worked at the hospital since 1997, told Al Jazeera she had personally logged 677 cases of birth defects since October 2009. Just eight days later when Al Jazeera visited the city on December 29, that number had already risen to 699.

“There are not even medical terms to describe some of these conditions because we’ve never seen them until now,” she said. “So when I describe it all I can do is describe the physical defects, but I’m unable to provide a medical term.”

‘Incompatible with life’

Most of these babies in Fallujah die within 20 to 30 minutes after being born, but not all.

Four-year-old Abdul Jaleel Mohammed was born in October 2007. His clinical diagnosis includes dilation of two heart ventricles, and a growth on his lower back that doctors have not been able to remove.

…[snip]…

In April 2011, Iraqi lawmakers debated whether the US attacks on the city constituted genocide. Resolutions that called for international prosecution, however, went nowhere.

Scientific proof

Alani, along with Dr Christopher Busby, a British scientist and activist who has carried out research into the risks of radioactive pollution, collected hair samples from 25 parents of families with children who have birth defects and sent them to a laboratory in Germany for analysis.

Alani and Busby, along with other doctors and researchers, published a study in September 2011 from data obtained by analysing the hair samples, as well as soil and water samples from the city.

Mercury, Uranium, Bizmuth and other trace elements were found.

The report’s conclusion states:

“Whilst caution must be exercised about ruling out other possibilities, because none of the elements found in excess are reported to cause congenital diseases and cancer except Uranium, these findings suggest the enriched Uranium exposure is either a primary cause or related to the cause of the congenital anomaly and cancer increases. Questions are thus raised about the characteristics and composition of weapons now being deployed in modern battlefields.”

“As doctors, we know Mercury, Uranium and Bismuth can contribute to the development of congenital abnormalities, and we think it could be related to the use of prohibited weapons by the Americans during these battles,” Alani said.

These are the war crimes made in America. And our SAF is complicit. Stop the wars. Stop the madness. Stop the crimes.

American soldiers rape about anyone

When the Yankees stole lands from the Native Americans, it wasn’t enough to satisfy them. So they raped women and children.

More than 200 years later, whenever they steal lands (like in Afghanistan and Iraq), they continue their rapes and torture.

But that ain’t enough too. So they rape their own womenfolk serving the military.

Rape in the ranks: Female US soldiers raped by comrades fight war on two fronts

Some American female troops deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan have had to fight another, more private battle. Besides the physical and psychological hardships of war, they’ve also had to face the trauma of sexual abuse from male comrades. And very few victims report the crime, as RTs Marina Portnaya reveals.

O:40 min – One in three women in the military gets raped!

Ironic that one of the arguments pro-war mongers give is that America invades Afghanistan and Iraq to remove despotic regimes which abuse women. So where are these hypocrites now when it is the American soldiers who rape their own women?

>Coward US Soldiers Murder Unarmed Elderly Iraqi Man

>Warning. Very graphic. The killing starts around the 3:00 min mark.

Note that about half a dozen of heavily armed US terrorist soldiers surrounded the unarmed man who did nothing but shouted at them. Also note that even when he was down after the first shot hit him, they continued to fire at him till he laid motionless.

By the way, what’s that stun grenade for? You throw it after the “enemy” is already flat on the ground? Awww…that truly shows how inept these Americun Yanks are, ain’t it?

http://www.youtube.com/get_player

Isn’t the definition of terrorists, ruthless cowards who kill unarmed civilians indiscriminately?

Saw how coward the US terrorists are as well, such that even after he was down and motionless, they did not even dare approach him?

PS – I always thought US soldiers are trained in closed unarmed combat. Surely a hunk could have taken that elderly man down easily without a single shot fired. Oh, I forgot, all the training you see US soldiers get are just in the movies. In the real world, they are just boys and kids.

Note: I uploaded the video clip directly onto Blogger because Youtube removed the above video, which was posted by another person. Now why would Youtube want to remove this video?

>American Oppression – Another Wikileaks Video to be leaked to the Public

>In the era of the internet, there is no running away from the Truth. While the Mainstream Media can cover up atrocities by the Terror Agency of the US Military, the internet spreads the real truth like a virus. Here’s a post that did exactly that. American Oppression – Pilot Fires at Unarmed Civilians in Iraq

We (the public) were told (by Wikileaks in a report somewhere – can’t remember) that a second video would be made available by Wikileaks. Here is an update of what that video may be about.

WikiLeaks 2: Wrath of Farah
Classified Video to Show One of Afghanistan’s Largest Air Strikes

With the Obama Administration scrambling to dismiss last week’s WikiLeaks.org video of the July 12, 2007 US killings of two Reuters reporters and several other Iraqi civilians, the increasingly controversial site is poised to drop another video bombshell, this time on a much more high profile attack.

On May 5, 2009, US aircrafts bombed a number of homes in the Afghan village of Abdul Basir Khan, in Farah Province. The death tollaccording to Afghan officials was upwards of 140 civilians.

The Pentagon initially claimed that the entire incident was made up and that the Taliban had pre-killed all the civilians and stored the bodies in buildings before tricking the US into bombing those buildings. They later conceded to have killed 26 people, but insisted that “no one will ever” know the exact numbers. They also claimed that the planes had no idea any civilians were in the area.

Exactly what is on the video is unknown at present, but last week’s video showed that military claims that the Reuters employees were killed in a “battle” were shown as demonstrably false, as there was never a battle and the helicopters clearly attacked a group of people walking casually down the street.

Centcom insisted that the Iraq video was “taken out of context.” Secretary of Defense Robert Gates likewise admitted that the video was “unfortunate” but insisted that the troops had acted appropriately and that the matter would not harm the US image abroad.

Since the release of the video WikiLeaks’ profile has grown enormously, but so has the harassment it faces from the intelligence community. The group says that its employees are under growing surveillance and one of their volunteers was even detained by police for 21 hours.

That’s what the US Military is good at. Kill innocents, then blame the enemy for their atrocities. Then when the truth catches up with them, it’s damage control time.

There are no terrorists in Iraq or Afghanistan. They’re all at the Pentagon and the White House.

>US Military Training bears Uncanny Resemblance to Terrorists’ Training

>When Wikileaks leaked a video of American soldiers firing at innocent civilians from an Apache, the veterans from the US Military go into Damage Control Mode. However, in their attempt to justify the horrific and blatant massacre of innocents, these veterans unwittingly confirm that such killings are common and are even taught by the US Military themselves!

Apache helicopter gunners talk good game ‘so the people don’t seem real’

WASHINGTON: US military veterans have spoken out about a video released this week of a US Apache helicopter crew gunning down people in a Baghdad street in 2007, in an attempt to explain why the soldiers joked and jeered as they carried out the killings.

A report yesterday said many people found the cockpit chatter in the Apache the most disturbing detail about the video, released this week by the advocacy group WikiLeaks.org.

The video shows the US military killing a Reuters photographer and his driver on a Baghdad street in 2007. The video, confirmed as authentic by the US military, shows repeated fire by two US Apache helicopter crews on a group of men including two Reuters employees, Namir Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh.

The soldiers joke and jeer as they shoot: “Look at those dead bastards,” one helicopter pilot says. Another replies: “Nice . . . good shootin’.”

Reports yesterday said many veterans who viewed the footage made the point that soldiers cannot do their jobs without creating psychological distance from the enemy. One reason that the soldiers seemed as if they were playing a video game is that, in a morbid but necessary sense, they were, experts told The New York Times.

“You don’t want combat soldiers to be foolish or to jump the gun, but their job is to destroy the enemy, and one way they’re able to do that is to see it as a game, so that the people don’t seem real,” Bret A. Moore, a former US army psychologist and co-author of the forthcoming book Wheels Down: Adjusting to Life After Deployment, told the newspaper.

Military training is fundamentally an exercise in overcoming a fear of killing another human, Lieutenant Colonel Dave Grossman, author of the book On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society, told the paper.

Now wait a minute. Aren’t terrorists trained in the exact same manner? That they are trained to be emotionless? Such that they distance themselves from their targets? So much so that all innocents, be it men, women, children will all be killed?

So has not the video that has been leaked, a real eye-opener on how US trains its soldiers to be like terrorists?

Well, that has to be, if you want to buy the “explanation” by those vets, who are only unwittingly incriminating the US Military further.

Oh well, if you are a hardcore supporter of US Military Terror Machinery, maybe the above damage control explanation sux. Howabout another damage control explanation from yet another vet?

Iraq War Vet: “We Were Told To Just Shoot People, And The Officers Would Take Care of Us”
Excerpts:

Truthout has spoken with several soldiers who shared equally horrific stories of the slaughtering of innocent Iraqis by US occupation forces

“I remember one woman walking by,” said Jason Washburn, a corporal in the US Marines who served three tours in Iraq. He told the audience at the Winter Soldier hearings that took place March 13-16, 2008, in Silver Spring, Maryland, “She was carrying a huge bag, and she looked like she was heading toward us, so we lit her up with the Mark 19, which is an automatic grenade launcher, and when the dust settled, we realized that the bag was full of groceries. She had been trying to bring us food and we blew her to pieces.”……..

Hart Viges, a member of the 82nd Airborne Division of the Army who served one year in Iraq, told of taking orders over the radio.

“One time they said to fire on all taxicabs because the enemy was using them for transportation…. One of the snipers replied back, ‘Excuse me? Did I hear that right? Fire on all taxicabs?’ The lieutenant colonel responded, ‘You heard me, trooper, fire on all taxicabs.’ After that, the town lit up, with all the units firing on cars. This was my first experience with war, and that kind of set the tone for the rest of the deployment.”……

Brian Casler, a corporal in the Marines, spoke of witnessing the prevalent dehumanizing outlook soldiers took toward Iraqis during the invasion of Iraq.

“… on these convoys, I saw Marines defecate into MRE bags or urinate in bottles and throw them at children on the side of the road,” he stated.

Scott Ewing, who served in Iraq from 2005-2006, admitted on one panel that units intentionally gave candy to Iraqi children for reasons other than “winning hearts and minds.

“There was also another motive,” Ewing said. “If the kids were around our vehicles, the bad guys wouldn’t attack. We used the kids as human shields.“…..

The article is quite long. You can read it at your own leisure and see how this killing of innocents is prevalent in the US Military.

So, all the characteristics of terror training are there in the US Military. From de-sensitizing and removing human emotions so as to facilitate killings, to using innocent children as human shields.

Isn’t the US Military the Number One Terror Agency of the World?

>American Oppression – Pilot Fires at Unarmed Civilians (Part 2)

>Two days ago, I posted this article on American Oppression – Pilot Fires at Unarmed Civilians in Iraq

In the article above, there is a video showing how US forces killed unarmed civilians indiscriminately. The video was given to Wikileaks by a whistleblower. It looks like this kind of incident is very common among US troops in foreign lands. That’s the kind of soldiers we have out there – believing that their toy Apaches and machine guns are like video games.

As it turns out, the leaked video is now spreading all over the internet world – to the point that the Pentagon is now pressured to give an official statement. Had this video not been leaked, all the atrocities US troops have been meting out will once again be forgotten.

Do remember that the tortures of prisoners of war at Abu Ghraib was also leaked out by whistleblowers. US atrocities is much more prevalent than what it appears.

Article on the leaked video below.

Leaked video shows civilian killings in Iraq, signifies growing power of independent Web journalism

When a nonprofit group this week released video footage, leaked via a source in the Pentagon, showing a 2007 U.S. helicopter attack on a group of civilians in Baghdad, the clip unleashed a viral online sensation and ignited an intense debate about the conduct of U.S. forces in Iraq.

But the simple fact of the video’s release also reflects the ongoing revolution in how news gets produced and published.

The group, called WikiLeaks, released the Pentagon video on Monday. Less than 24 hours later, the clip had netted more than 1.3 million viewers on YouTube alone.

The transmission of information, in and out of regularly authorized channels, has become much more immediate — and far more viral — than at any point in history. Virtually anyone with a browser and a DSL connection can now bring news to light in dramatic and instantaneous fashion. All these trends converged with the WikiLeaks video.

Seven noncombatants were killed in the Baghdad attack — among them a driver (Saeed Chmagh) and photographer (Namir Noor-Eldeen) employed by the Reuters news service. Reuters, indeed, had been seeking to obtain internal Pentagon materials pertaining to the attack — including the footage that went online yesterday — for the past three years, using the Freedom of Information Act. The agency’s efforts had so far proved fruitless.

And that’s where WikiLeaks came in. The nonprofit website launched in 2006 as an online clearinghouse for whistleblowers seeking to publicize leaked government documents across the world. But prior to posting the video footage, the site had functioned as repository of information; with this latest scoop, which it says came from “a courageous source” within the U.S. military, it has morphed into an investigative news source in its own right. (The full 18-minute video can be viewed — albeit with the clear warning that the material is quite disturbing — at the special project URL that WikiLeaks established for it, under the incendiary name of collateralmurder.com.)

“The material was encrypted with a code, and we broke the code,”WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told wired.com. “In terms of journalism efficiency, I think we discovered a lot with a small amount of resources.”

But this was much more than a question of cracking an encryption code from a renegade PC. WikiLeaks also reported the story the old-fashioned way — by sending two reporters to Baghdad to research the 2007 incident. The group says its correspondents verified the story by interviewing witnesses and family members of people killed and injured in the attack. These accounts helped to flesh out the gaps in the official account of the incident; as the materials at CollateralMurder.com explain, the “military did not reveal how the Reuters staff were killed, and stated that they did not know how the children were injured.” And now that silence is starting to abate: In response to the release of the WikiLeaks video, the Pentagon has circulated some documents relating to the incident, and MSNBC reported this morning that American soldiers mistook a camera held by one of the fallen journalists for a weapon.

Still, the release of the video has also drawn criticism — not so much for the broader WikiLeaks mission of promoting government transparency, but for the site’s failure to supply a fuller context to help viewers better understand what they’re seeing. A former helicopter pilot and photographer named A.J. Martinez, for example, has dissected the footage on his blog, and attacked the site’s packaging of the footage as misleading — and making it seem like the Apache unit was acting out of cold-blooded malice rather than genuine confusion about a possible ground attack taking shape below. “There are many veterans with thousands of hours experience in both analyzing aerial video and understanding the oft-garbled radio transmissions between units,” he writes, adding that it would not be unreasonable for the WikiLeaks staff to solicit such interpretive input for concerned vets. “Promoting truth with gross errors is just as shameful as unnecessary engagement” on the field of battle, Martinez concludes.

Yahoo! News contacted Reuters for comment, and a Reuters spokeswoman directed us to their story on the episode, in addition to providing us with the following statement:

“The deaths of Namir Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh three years ago were tragic and emblematic of the extreme dangers that exist in covering war zones. We continue to work for journalist safety and call on all involved parties to recognise the important work that journalists do and the extreme danger that photographers and video journalists face in particular,” said David Schlesinger, editor-in-chief of Reuters news. “The video released today via WikiLeaks is graphic evidence of the dangers involved in war journalism and the tragedies that can result.”

Meanwhile, WikiLeaks appears to be far from done. The group is openly soliciting donations to defray the expenses involved in the upcoming release of another video that allegedly documents other civilian deaths at the hands of the U.S. military, this time in Afghanistan.

(Update: Greg Sargent, at the Washington Post’s Plumline, reports that the Pentagon is preparing to issue an official response in the wake of the leaked video, perhaps as early as today.)
—Brett Michael Dykes is a national affairs writer for Yahoo! News.

>American Oppression – Pilot Fires at Unarmed Civilians in Iraq

>Warning – Graphic scenes of:

1. Unarmed civilians fired upon
2. Helpers who come to aid injured fired upon too
3. Tank rolls over one of the dead bodies

Yes, they hate America because Americans are free. Free to kill innocents without restraint.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/36182090#36182090

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

- US pilot fires at civilians from helicopter.

- Two of them were cameramen. Pilot mistook their camera slings for RPG slings. Can you believe that? Are American soldiers so daft that they can’t differentiate a camera from an RPG?

- The group of men who were fired upon were walking in casual manner, hardly any sign of being insurgents.

- When others came to aid the injured, the pilot opens fire at them too. What kind of sicko US soldiers do we have there?

Video clip above taken from link below.
U.S. pilot seen firing on people in Iraq